lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 08:45:57 -0500 From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] Computational comparison of 3 schemes... On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Christian Forler <christian.forler@...-weimar.de> wrote: > Your are welcome to fork Catena. I add you as a Collaborator. So feel > free to add an optimized version of Catena. Thanks! I'll make a waywardgeek branch where I can thrash the code without impacting master. There are several things I want to try, including the faster hash function, and larger block sizes. I also want to see what can be done for useful parallelism. It may make sense to run Catena-3 on GPUs in the future on purpose, for example, and we'll never reach the kinds of memory bandwidth Alexander obtains without more parallelism. Bill
Powered by blists - more mailing lists