| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140206151301.GA31515@openwall.com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 19:13:02 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] Combining sliding window and bit-reversal On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:18:37AM +0000, Samuel Neves wrote: > On 30-01-2014 03:34, Solar Designer wrote: > > > >> By definition only the most significant bit of each byte is looked at in > >> PSHUFB, so it's OK to share the same selection mask. I've additionally > >> used PSHUFB to compute the bit reversal of 4-bit values, which should be > >> somewhat faster. Here it is: > > > > Thanks! Compared to yours, my SSSE3 code looks naive. > > > > This is in the public domain, correct? (My bitrev.c is.) > > Correct. I've placed a cleaned up version at > https://gist.github.com/sneves/8702353 with disclaimers and attributions. Thanks! I just found a similar algorithm in: http://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/article/165685/clmul-wp-rev-2.01-2012-09-21.pdf page 19. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists