phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] On Delegation (Was: "Why I Don't Recommend Scrypt")

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGiyFddxEY+_APPdXQjrbC=s4dVUW+XdSvaQxjdKmj3fLWVt4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:28:48 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] On Delegation (Was: "Why I Don't Recommend Scrypt")

>>
>>   | For example, one may design a scheme that is slow to evaluate
>>   | except on a server given some server-specific shortcut.
>
> I think this was Jean-Philippe Aumasson's idea, unless he got it from
> somewhere else.
>

I had mentionned this indeed, but I guess the idea has been around for
some time and I'm pretty sure I got it from someone else, though I
can't remember at the moment.