phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] escrypt naming (Re: [PHC] TigerPHS paper and code ready for review)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140325020919.GA4992@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:09:19 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] escrypt naming (Re: [PHC] TigerPHS paper and code ready for review)

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 06:41:03PM -0400, Bill Cox wrote:
> Another dumb idea - Scrypt2?  Of course that would only make sense
> with the blessing of the author of Scrypt.  I frankly don't know this
> crowd or their relationships, so I have no idea if that is possible,
> but but it gets around the LiteCoin people.  I googled it, and it
> looks like it is not claimed by anyone.

Thank you for all those ideas!

Rich Felker suggested what I think is the winner: escalcrypt.  No hits
on Google web search for this one, none at all.  Of course, this will
change soon after I send this message, and that's fine.  So chances are
that escrypt will become escalcrypt.

"Your search - escalcrypt - did not match any documents."

Alexander