phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] The SkinnyCat lives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAyV7nEiVeS3kxOfp+E_nUGKXcZ0OLPdd8pw9jU2aEdFG16Aiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:33:02 -0400
From: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] The SkinnyCat lives

Bill,

That makes sense. I wasn't sure if that was intentional or not. Thanks for
the quick followup, it makes perfect sense!

Anthony


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > I opened a quick issue. It appears that SkinnyCat limits passwords to 255
> > bytes due to the length parameter being declared as a `uint8_t`. The
> > algorithm itself seems to support longer passwords as everywhere else it
> is
> > used internally other than the 2 function headers is represented by a
> > `unit32_t` field. So not sure if this is intentional or not, nor if it
> is an
> > issue or not. Just pointing out an observation.
> >
> > Anthony
>
> Hi, Anthony.  This is intentional.  The full TwoCats algorithm allows
> password, data, and salt lengths up to 2^30 bytes each, but to do
> this, I need to use the Init/Update/Final APIs to all of the supported
> cryptographic hash functions.  In SkinnyCat, by limiting the password
> and salt to a combined 512 bytes, I can allocate an array on the stack
> without even calling malloc, concatenate all the input data there, and
> make a simple call to the hashing API on one line.
>
> With this scheme, adding a new hash function, so long as it outputs
> 256 bits, requires just adding a new enumerated type value, and two
> lines in a switch statement.  In comparison, TwoCats has an object
> oriented wrapper class to support hash functions.  It's more powerful,
> but it adds complexity.
>
> Thanks for taking a look.  There are probably goobers in there.  This
> code did not exist 30 hours ago, and I've worked on it for most of
> those hours.  Sleep deprivation has to have had an impact.
>
> Bill
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped