lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 07:03:08 +0000
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <>
To:, Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] submitters on discussions list

In message <>, Solar Designer writes:

>Can/should we require/ensure that all PHC submitters are subscribed to
>the discussions list?

Given how much email I personally get, any "mandatory subscription"
demands tends to piss me off a fair bit, so I'm very weary about
doing that to other people.

I think we should make it clear that discussions@ is where the
trouble starts, but leave it up to the submitters to decide if they
want to fence for their creation, or just let it float.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@...eBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists