phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Re: EARWORM review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOLP8p6cSX_a2yRr+WiTmw_5dGV96k2NfOCVOSUNdjFO1ftfSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 20:01:49 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Re: EARWORM review

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@...il.com> wrote:
> EARWORM is well differentiated from yescript, IMO.  It is a slimmer
> simpler special purpose tool.  The reliance on AESENC instructions and
> the super fast read-only hashing sets it apart.

Actually the super fast hashing is both my favorite feature of
EARWORM, and the feature that I hate most.  I can't believe a hashing
algorithm called EARWORM hashes at almost twice my bandwidth.  You're
basically running at memmove speed!

Bill