lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:44:00 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@....freebsd.dk> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PHC] Mechanical tests (was: POMELO fails the dieharder tests) In message <CAOLP8p7wqfgsEQmD2iQg6AgKLhZZvYkL2oegrub3kxVgkvts5w@...l.gmail.com> , Bill Cox writes: >By the way, the compression test is already in dieharder. Yes, I know that, but it is still a "onesided" test. What I want to test is twosided: Do we at least get as much entropy out as we put in ? I realize that it's trivially easy to survive that test, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be run. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@...eBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists