phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] EARWORM (ROM hard is not enough)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ppktmehj.fsf@wolfjaw.dfranke.us>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:54:48 -0400
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] EARWORM (ROM hard is not enough)

Steve Thomas <steve@...tu.com> writes:

> Also loading a large ROM into memory might not be good for UX in certain
> cases. This is OK in cases where the ROM is always in memory like
> authentication servers, but for FDE it might be annoying waiting for it to
> read a few gigs from disk. Although this isn't a big problem for new SSDs,
> my craptop would take awhile.

Don't use EARWORM for FDE. As discussed in the submission document, it's
designed for authentication servers and nothing else.