lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:49:13 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] The best of the best, IMO


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:40:07PM -0700, Jeremi Gosney wrote:
> On 4/12/2014 11:36 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> > In other words, Pufferfish is primarily for native code implementations,
> > and battcrypt is primarily for scripting languages with native Blowfish.
> >
> > Jeremi, Steve - are the above correct summaries?
> Yep, I'd say that is an accurate summation.

Great.  Now, a way battcrypt might win over Pufferfish anyway is if we
determine that it performs better even when both are compiled to native
code (defensive).  This will take some testing, for both defense and
attack.  Are you doing this sort of testing? :-)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists