phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Any other authores ready for benchmarking?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ha5pmgjg.fsf@wolfjaw.dfranke.us>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:26:43 -0400
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Any other authores ready for benchmarking?

Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com> writes:

> Yesterday, I had some fun benchmarking Lyra2, TwoCats, and Yescrypt.
>  Are there any other authors who would like their algorithms
> benchmarked?  I'd be happy to start tabulating data on all the entries
> that are ready for benchmarking.  After yesterday's hack-fest, I don't
> feel simply running the PHS routines without the involvement of the
> author is likely to generate useful data, so I'm only going to do
> benchmarking the authors request for now.

Feel free to include EARWORM in your benchmarks. You seem to have
studied it enough that I trust you to get it right. Unfortunately, I
won't be available to assist for a while. My life recently has been
completely consumed by my day job, and next week I'm running away to the
Yukon to get as far away from an internet connection as possible.