phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Best use of ROM in password hashing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOLP8p4Bjd1ShrHUef7Cw37qW4XNcQJJ-znx8uYRhfgyvLTRyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:42:21 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Best use of ROM in password hashing

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:59:39PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > yescrypt's current ROM initialization algorithm is meant to work for the
> > anti-botnet purpose (with botnet nodes much smaller then the defender's
> > authentication servers), even if the seed is stolen.
>
> s/then/than/
>
> Maybe I should re-read what I post.  ... but it's not as bad as Bill's
> "script" and "yescript" in place of "scrypt" and "yescrypt". ;-)
>
> Alexander
>

Yeah... sorry about that and the generally terrible spelling and grammar.
 I never could spell, and now that reading is fairly slow and painful, my
self-review of my writing is almost worthless.

Bill

Content of type "text/html" skipped