lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47a37b900d154b9b8ac4fc506151b276@BY2PR03MB554.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:38:46 +0000 From: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com> To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net> Subject: RE: [PHC] PHS API copyright? From: Krisztián Pintér [mailto:pinterkr@...il.com] > > i was under the impression that the PHC function have > descriptive purposes only, not intended to be actually > used. it is a programmer's way describing how to set > up and invoke the alogrithm in a general way. By having the same signature, it also allows test programs to swap out function pointers for maximally-fair comparisons. While I too am shocked by the recent court ruling about APIs, it's hard to imagine it will be a huge impact on PHC. Jean-Philippe is "discussing this with qualified people". Don't worry, we'll do the right thing. - Marsh ------------------ My personal opinions only, boilerplate disclaimers apply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists