[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5400EC3B.1060102@ciphershed.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:10:19 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: A review per day - Schvrch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Since I do not expect a lot of Tortuga discussion, I'm moving on to
Schvrch. Here's a link to the April discussion:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.phc/1330
Here's my notes on Schvrch:
- - Weak paper and code. I do not believe much effort went into Schvrch.
- - The time cost has weak average memory*time because only one 2KiB
block is used while applying time cost.
- - No cryptographic primitives are applied, yet the mixing function
seems weak.
- - The evolve function at end just XORs states together and complements
them, leaving each as a simple linear combination of the original.
- - The author seems to have the mistaken impresion that just XORing
data over and over will mix it well.
I don't think there's much reason to spend a lot of time discussing
this version of Schvrch. So... I'll post one more today...
Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=yJe+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists