[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54061D73.4080705@ciphershed.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:41:39 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] A review per day - Schvrch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I owe you an apology. I'm sorry to have called your paper and code
weak. By the paper, I only meant the PHC submission, not your
attached paper. The code *is* weak as a framework for a secure
successor of Scrypt or bcrypt. As a demonstration of using the stir,
revolve, and evolve functions for memory hashing, it's buggy, but
likely shows your intent well. It would be simple enough to cut these
three functions out of Schvrch and paste them into one of the other
entries with a stronger password defense framework. I'd be happy to
help with that if needed.
Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUBh1wAAoJEAcQZQdOpZUZMIoQAI3AxHyUC7Ij017eyS7WcmPi
PAGs+UkspCfkzrwmRfrKLithQ/knmgPyy7zht3p2PexpZ4GXVvbyNJHXrQ4P7hDA
EOijHJhXt6HWdWAJxFPjMlcn11d4FYPgiMS9vzHFBTRtzQ8SdKJ+GcnO3yMSopn+
h3VJi9isvTOq8KjCXrRMGaIiq/0HyaPH3ePaJ0Vd5ShtXXJrRIx2ngWjj6xnEPpq
9d5T9GGPMcIfHj+rN4hL2EZ8YTMuWJf0elQ/LuyVQ/3SgM2fzvftG2mpv0BMHE4o
lmyQH0NsUKPDfgoxX+RHOvr998E9iCPcy2ZJashZQ4o9FWMgD4byBg/Cmp01JgOL
WejiXbQCBEJ4Zuyuh6mcFsQkqvwreZBX/Dzk51lVLrOY3h20PxVgi17ZzyeoC7qu
rL5eLEkcWGAko0wMR1uRxuIuoIpSFtl/4SeMKe8fNDfGkQSGYiiIu2pqStIllCBc
W6bZUvJetZtSku2fZJmDETc/7JDkc4XHtwDChPqAJltSINVR+pvNK4S8TIrn5eTL
WDNF9i4SJ7WUPALgY58GWoWMb52TUwQHJtLlUi7QwquC4Ms9SyNHX6VcBTDT4F/6
K6dtm3OgfM8WcymIBs4LXplIdFObseOr0jwvUTGB4NFRZBwU3Qcsc8Dt/2KyuRnw
aEwuTRe+gp0x5Lk/+kZU
=wm20
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists