phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Cryptographically strong salt is not overkill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54083F8F.2000508@dei.uc.pt>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:31:43 +0100
From: Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Cryptographically strong salt is not overkill

On 09/04/2014 06:58 AM, Brandon Enright wrote:
> Even many poor PRNGs are indistinguishable from random when you only
> have the first 128 bits of their output (e.g. Mersenne Twister).

They absolutely are if seeded from a 32-bit integer, as usual. There are only at most 2^32 distinct streams.