[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541C8EC3.4010702@ciphershed.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:14:59 -0400
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] A review per day - Catena
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/2014 01:28 PM, Christian Forler wrote:
> Am 15.09.2014 um 14:19 schrieb Dmitry Khovratovich:
>
>> It is somewhat strange to not take into account the existing
>> third-party cryptanalysis when doing such a review. For example
>
> We, the Catena Design Team, took the excellent TMTO analysis by
> Dmitry and Alex into account. :-)
I was impressed with his TMTO attack. As I said, they did better than
me by 15% on Catena-3. The entire presentation had a lot of good
work. I only take issue with the unrealistic ASIC power analysis.
I look forward to reading your new paper!
Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=cb/Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists