[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140921172424.7f9d6c85@lambda>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:24:24 +0000
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh@...ndonenright.net>
To: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org>
Cc: discussions@...sword-hashing.net, bmenrigh@...ndonenright.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] omegacrypt and timing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 08:48:53 -0400
Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...hershed.org> wrote:
> I really hope there's something good here. I would love to see a
> really good anti-SIMD moving forward, not that my opinion counts.
>
> Can I rewrite your code this way?
>
> depth = 0
> while true:
> if coinFlip()
> depth++
> else
> depth--
> if depth <= 0:
> return
> switch depth:
> case 1:
> do_work_1()
> case 2:
> do_work_2()
> ...
> case N:
> do_work_N()
Your code doesn't emulate where execution stays in the outer loop and
doesn't enter the inner loop. I think you need to add a depth-- after
all of the cases.
Also, your case 1, case2, ... case n structure doesn't have a stack to
it so it can't emulate nested loops like:
while (coinflip()) {
do_some_work();
while (coinflip()) { ... }
do_some_more_work();
}
You'd need a way of supporting cases nestled within other cases and
that needs a stack-like datastructure.
Brandon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlQfCdQACgkQqaGPzAsl94IY9wCeIna6kBJdWJYXusgGwL3ysEBe
GJ0AnA9Ux0uABbEwimvJOcXv3DkRiipK
=JToa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists