phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Design Rationale and Security Analysis of PHC candidates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALW8-7JGEwPZDDQ5CZEq17Jv_d2PFzAeN4d92d6YuL=8xSoMig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:59:34 +0200
From: Dmitry Khovratovich <khovratovich@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Design Rationale and Security Analysis of PHC candidates

It applies to the schemes that may leak secret information via timing
side-channels. I did not make a distinction between cache-based timing
attacks and more direct leakages (like simply measuring the execution
time), but it is worth to do perhaps.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Dmitry Khovratovich
> <khovratovich@...il.com> wrote:
> > We have prepared a small survey of the design rationale and security
> > https://www.cryptolux.org/images/4/4f/PHC-overview.pdf
>
> congratulations, very useful work. however, i don't understand the
> last column of the second table named "Timing Attacks". what does it
> include?
>



-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Khovratovich

Content of type "text/html" skipped