phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOLP8p6DjGJdpiPjyH5VyNmBfPTcwV4EStCame6jZ6WsQeAamg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:26:32 -0500
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I run some simple tests with almost all PHC candidates
> (plus Catena2 and RIG2 submitted here).
>
> Maybe it could be useful, it is in fact it is kind of an independent
> extension
> what Bill Cox sent here for reviews.
>

This is excellent work!  In know how hard it is to write wrappers for each
PHC entry, compile, run verify input parameters, etc.  This is a very
valuable effort, IMO.

I guess I have a big/little ending bug in there somewhere in TwoCats.
Thanks for running this test.

Bill

Content of type "text/html" skipped