lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1012754290.20141210215945@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:59:45 +0100 From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC finalists announcement Tony Arcieri (at Wednesday, December 10, 2014, 12:31:09 AM): > The original criteria were much clearer than your paraphrase. I'm > not sure why you paraphrased the criteria as such. It makes the > discussion that much more confusing. i did not paraphrase, it was a char by char copy, with the examples and details in parentheses cut. which important detail was missing? > What are these new aspects? I'm confused what you're confused about. - quality of the documentation - quality of the reference implementation - originality and innovation none of these are in the original list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists