phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC finalists announcement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1012754290.20141210215945@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:59:45 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC finalists announcement



Tony Arcieri (at Wednesday, December 10, 2014, 12:31:09 AM):

> The original criteria were much clearer than your paraphrase. I'm
> not sure why you paraphrased the criteria as such. It makes the
> discussion that much more confusing.

i did not paraphrase, it was a char by char copy, with the examples
and details in parentheses cut. which important detail was missing?


> What are these new aspects? I'm confused what you're confused about. 

- quality of the documentation
- quality of the reference implementation
- originality and innovation

none of these are in the original list.