lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412121041110.22319@debian> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:44:21 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan.Lucks@...-weimar.de To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] How important is salting really? On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, epixoip wrote: > But salting alone is insufficient. For each hash we crack a salt is > eliminated and never checked again. Therefore our attacks speed up with > each hash we crack. Could you elaborate what you mean? Usually, the salt is known to the attacker, so there is no need to *crack* a salt at all? So long Stefan ------ I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! ------ <http://www.uni-weimar.de/cms/medien/mediensicherheit/home.html> --Stefan.Lucks (at) uni-weimar.de, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists