phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC status report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98G0OgpMb74SM0RxzBnkvr5sAfQRRnC8zF24nYAjN4up-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:53:35 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

this is the actual information you based your decision on? i'm pretty
sure one of you put this document together in one afternoon. i see no
reason why would anyone hope to learn anything here after this. i can
only hope the crypto community knows better than trusting a false
sense of authority provided by an acronym (PHC), and chooses to ignore
this non-information. if not, you are welcome to choose your own
candidates as winners, and celebrate.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Jean-Philippe Aumasson
<jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:
> With our apologies for the delay: https://password-hashing.net/report1.html