phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC status report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98FjOz1isjUCjKyCqfB5nvhJ5T2UNPs-6D0Vt2G7uA7Yhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:04:08 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Jean-Philippe Aumasson
<jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:

> Thanks for your understanding,

the thanks was premature, understanding is not given.

> Each panel member was
> requested to list his/her favorite and least favorite submissions

i think this voting should be public. not that i agree with this method.

> To let members speak freely about submissions,
> both positively and negatively, these discussions were not made
> public.

this discussion should also be summarized, anonimized, and made public.