phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC status report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150211203313.GA8628@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:33:13 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:27:16PM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> Being the first such contest, it isn't mature.

s/contest/competition/

I actually find these words different (competition between schemes, not
contest between submitters), and the use of the improper word in this
one place extremely unfortunate.  It's not what I meant.  I apologize.

Alexander