phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC status report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98FfpO8ViB0PfJSm+qiZ7_RqpRfdR+SsvY=f0XqA45bLmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:49:45 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> The panel has already considered then-available information on the
> candidates' security and performance.

or at least you say so. we can choose to trust your word, or not. we
can not verify.

> In other words, is this just to do the 22 candidates justice (while
> distracting us from selecting the winners to doing this previous step in
> what might or might not be a better way)

uhm, eeer, without proper analysis, you are in no position to base
your choice on anything. this sounds like you have a winner already,
and the other candidates are just obstacles in your way.