lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:26:34 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <>
To: Tony Arcieri <>
CC: "" <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

Tony Arcieri (at Monday, February 16, 2015, 6:59:00 AM):
> I have a very candid question for Krisztián Pintér and Somitra Sanadhya:
> Do you think there's a general process problem with the PHC, or do
> you think specific candidates were descriminated against?

i have already answered that question, after ignoring like 3 similar
accusations. let me find that for you. here it is:

"this is not the first time a panel member pulls this cheap trick to
call us sore losers to discredit criticism. guess what, even if i'm a
sore loser, the criticism must still be answered in a meaningful
manner, to avoid, you know, the impression that it might be true."

Powered by blists - more mailing lists