phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC status report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHOTMVL1k2TCXcY7hzkV0s6GoJXfyXhON2_kSCqR+k2J0WMrBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:01:16 -0800
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

On Monday, February 16, 2015, Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com> wrote:
>
> i did. but some people does not take a hint.


Ok, thank you for being explicit


> general process problem, more precisely the absolute lack of anything that
> could be called a process.
>

I am a PHC judge, but speaking entirely of my own behest I feel you are a
sore loser who is making a lot of unnecessary bluster.


-- 
Tony Arcieri

Content of type "text/html" skipped