phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC status report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHOTMVJauiWKjKH3HistTeC6SuWYU9yZSVH4fW-Hx4siXAbRvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:32:10 -0800
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jean-Philippe Aumasson <
jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:

> please remain civil. Having a little discontent is ok, but being rude
> and a jackass is not.

I apologize, my comment was out-of-line.

Krisztián, perhaps I can give some more constructive feedback. I think you
are frustrated with a lack of transparency in the PHC process, and I agree
that's a problem. There is much internal discussion about the process being
more transparent.

As I have read your remarks though, I feel they're more motivated by your
emotions than by objective criticisms of the PHC. Perhaps you too can work
towards more constructive criticisms of the PHC?

-- 
Tony Arcieri

Content of type "text/html" skipped