phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] PHC status report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHOTMVJrZ+Z0bTc4+v4WctBKTG1E9C0FfQ=zJpwbsoq_pFPmPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:31:38 -0800
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC status report

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Rade Vuckovac <rade.vuckovac@...il.com>
wrote:

> Tony Arcieri wrote: “Schvrch: No PRFs applied to input, probably not
> cryptographically secure”
>
>
>
> 1. As was mentioned before (here and the submission), there is a quite a
> few analysis concerning Schvrch primitive. The summary can be seen here *http://dakhilalian.iut.ac.ir/pdff/C26.pdf
> <http://dakhilalian.iut.ac.ir/pdff/C26.pdf>*
>
Hi there,

I had not seen this paper. I will give it a read.

I apologize if my analysis was naive.

-- 
Tony Arcieri

Content of type "text/html" skipped