lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOLP8p78NgQmqgxvH3GU1_+=jgyVga9JotQOYZ+LKom4BzL6Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 20:30:40 -0800
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Comparing speed of entries

There seems to be some confusion about how to compare the speed of entries
in the PHC.  IMO, we should:

- Compare entries when using the _same_ hash function, the same number of
rounds, and the same number of threads.

With this simple rule, it is easy to see that Yescrypt is the fastest,
Lyra2 is the second fastest.

Speed counts :-)

Bill

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ