lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:44:57 -0700
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Re: Password hashing by itself is not enough

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Justin Cappos <jcappos@....edu> wrote:

>
>> Key management / Protector account management concerns aside, I think it
>> is reasonable to say the result (the resulting security posture) of a
>> secret key and PolyPass are fairly similar if not exactly the same?
>>
>
> Yes, it is effectively the same.   In both cases, one needs to somehow
> recover the key before individual cracking passwords.  So in both cases,
> there is something the attacker must obtain before performing traditional
> password cracking.
>

While I am a fan of PolyPass, it provides different security than a master
secret.  If a small number of passwords is need, like 3, then an attacker
only needs to create 3 shill accounts before stealing the password DB.  If
the number is very high, like 1000, then only very popular sites could
afford the login delay on startup (or alternatively the temporary lack of
protection on user accounts as suggested in the paper).  Also, while a
master password could in theory even defeat the MiB, the MiB could simply
ask 1,000 of it's employees for their passwords, and an oppressive
government could simply demand passwords from 1,000 citizens.  In contrast,
a master secret, if managed successfully, stops an attacker without access
to the secret cold.  However, getting that secret is probably a simple
legal procedure in many cases.

Bill

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists