phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Password hashing by itself is not enough

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALiR+uPtacD4pqhG5fjgeSVdcvimDitA0+Q5z4PXTGbkrx4cJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:14:13 +0100
From: Sascha Schmidt <sascha.schmidt@...-weimar.de>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Password hashing by itself is not enough

2015-03-13 5:28 GMT+01:00 Ben Harris <mail@...rr.is>:
> The latest Catena paper suggests a way to do this in a reversible manner (to
> preserve the client independent update).
Thanks for bringing this up. We totally forgot to implement the
client-independent update for keyed hashing. I just pushed a version
containing it to my github. Christian will probably merge it soon.