phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Re: [SPAM] [PHC] Password hashing by itself is not enough

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <op.xvfz4ggxyldrnw@laptop-air>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:32:30 -0700
From: "Jeremy Spilman" <jeremy@...link.co>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Re: [SPAM] [PHC] Password hashing by itself is not enough

> I Googled Blind Hashing, and the top result is a patent titled Blind  
> Hashing.  At Google, we're forbidden from reading patents, so I did not  
> even >read the summary.  Is your idea patented, or was this just a  
> random unrelated patent?

Yes, it is mine. The 2nd or 3rd result are good alternatives if you're  
forbidden from reading patents.

If practicing a 'see no evil' theory, maybe Google should let you set a  
preference on your account to not show Google Patents in the results!
Content of type "text/html" skipped