lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <op.xvfz4ggxyldrnw@laptop-air>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:32:30 -0700
From: "Jeremy Spilman" <jeremy@...link.co>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Re: [SPAM] [PHC] Password hashing by itself is not enough
> I Googled Blind Hashing, and the top result is a patent titled Blind
> Hashing. At Google, we're forbidden from reading patents, so I did not
> even >read the summary. Is your idea patented, or was this just a
> random unrelated patent?
Yes, it is mine. The 2nd or 3rd result are good alternatives if you're
forbidden from reading patents.
If practicing a 'see no evil' theory, maybe Google should let you set a
preference on your account to not show Google Patents in the results!
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists