lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:53:49 +0300
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:09:39PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 04:45 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> > 
> > Thus, yescrypt v1's output for a shorter length is always a prefix of
> > its output for a longer length.  I'd appreciate you re-testing yescrypt
> > for this property.
> This test is output from original submission (with special case):
> And now the version 1:
> So it works as expected.

Thanks!  It would also be helpful if you test the same for g > 0, which
exposes additional relevant code paths that are not available via PHS().


Powered by blists - more mailing lists