phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests (ROUND2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:06:13 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests (ROUND2)

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:19:59AM -0300, Marcos Antonio Simplicio Junior wrote:
> Minimum parameters is good, but probably it is also necessary to consider the number of calls to the underlying function as previously suggested by Steve Thomas.

I agree.  Actually, consider the total number of rounds of the
underlying primitive.

> we are currently working with GPU-based implementations of candidates. If we finish the tests in time, we will try to submit it to the PasswordsCon . 

Cool!  Let me know if access to our dev box with GTX TITAN and HD 7990
would be of any help.

Also, it'd be nice to have your implementations integrated into JtR.

Alexander