| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1017751537.928151.1427787323461.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxuslxltgw07.lxa.perfora.net> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 02:35:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Thomas <steve@...tu.com> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC: survey and benchmarks > On March 23, 2015 at 9:33 PM Steve Thomas <steve@...tu.com> wrote: > > Name | t_cost for 2x | t_cost for 3x | t_cost for 4x | t_cost for 5x > -----------+---------------+---------------+---------------+--------------- > Argon | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 > battcrypt | 0 | 1 | 3 | - > Catena | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 > Lyra2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 > POMELO | 1 | - | 2 | - > Pufferfish | - | 0 | - | 1 > yescrypt | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 > Well that's embarrassing there's a typo for my algorithm's t_cost for 4x. Luckily it's a higher number so no one can say it was deliberate. :) Here's the corrected version: Name | t_cost for 2x | t_cost for 3x | t_cost for 4x | t_cost for 5x -----------+---------------+---------------+---------------+--------------- Argon | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 battcrypt | 0 | 1 | 2 | - Catena | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Lyra2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 POMELO | 1 | - | 2 | - Pufferfish | - | 0 | - | 1 yescrypt | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists