phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] OMG we have benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOLP8p6oQZ3H=CBnxc0v0TAvX3HxxUNKF-bbQy1_Q2h8xaCSYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:35:27 -0700
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] OMG we have benchmarks

These charts look like Lyra2 is still running with 2 threads, and Yescrypt
is still running with 6 rounds rather than a more comparable 2 rounds.

These are pretty pictures, but the benchmarks I ran with a bit more care
showed a very different picture.  I'd hate to see a winner selected based
on nice coloring and one algorithm running 2 threads vs all the rest with
1, and one algorithms running 6 rounds rather than 2.

Bill

Content of type "text/html" skipped