phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Panel: Please require the finalists to help with benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSMJWC69wjqfyGBa8Y7QffMqe+y9M9kZfeHcYcsnFMAYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:01:28 +0000
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Panel: Please require the finalists to help with benchmarks

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@...il.com> wrote:
> [As an aside, state of the art verification of secp256k1 on a 3.2GHz
> desktop cpu is around 70,000 verifications per second]
I should correct, measuring this morning I got 58k/s-- the 70k number
must be me remembering batch verification.
(doesn't change the point I was making, but I don't want to be
responsible for sticking a bad figure in people's heads :) Sorry.)