phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] winner selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <552BE744.6000700@dei.uc.pt>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:56:52 +0100
From: Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] winner selection

On 04/13/2015 04:43 PM, Jim Manico wrote:
> Why only have one winner? Why not choose several winners with various trade-offs based on need?
>

To prevent exposing complexity to users. It's hard enough for experts to choose which functions are better in which
situations; we should not pass that complexity along to end users, if we can avoid it.