lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <552BE744.6000700@dei.uc.pt> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:56:52 +0100 From: Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] winner selection On 04/13/2015 04:43 PM, Jim Manico wrote: > Why only have one winner? Why not choose several winners with various trade-offs based on need? > To prevent exposing complexity to users. It's hard enough for experts to choose which functions are better in which situations; we should not pass that complexity along to end users, if we can avoid it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists