phc-discussions - RE: [PHC] winner selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:33:59 +0000
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@...auckland.ac.nz>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] winner selection

Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com> writes:
>From: Jim Manico [mailto:jim@...ico.net]
>>
>> Why only have one winner? Why not choose several winners with various trade-offs
>> based on need?
>
>Here's my 2c on that, which I sent to the -panel list a minute ago:

And ditto my +1 on everything Marsh has said (I'd said this on the non-public
-panel list, but wanted to get it into the public record as well).

Peter.