phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Argon2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <552DFD8C.30406@dei.uc.pt>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 06:56:28 +0100
From: Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Argon2

On 14-04-2015 22:36, Solar Designer wrote:
> Samuel, were you thinking just one thread per core, though?  I guess
> with two threads/core on Haswell, BLAKE2b wouldn't need the 2 to 4
> instances you mentioned (for reaching full speed, overall)?

Yes, I was talking single-core single-thread. Independent G calls can obviously take advantage of (hyper-)threading,
when p > 1.