lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <552E72FA.1090403@Oracle.COM> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:17:30 +0100 From: Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat@...cle.COM> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net CC: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com> Subject: Re: [PHC] winner selection On 04/14/15 18:08, Marsh Ray wrote: > From: Darren J Moffat >> >> Though personally I don't mind too much if we end up with different algorithms for the PDKDF2 >> (key derivation) replacement use cases versus "password hash" use cases. > > But isn't that where we want good interoperability even more than for credential storage? Think encrypted document interchange. Yes I agree, and maybe I was too vague. What I was saying was ideally 1 winner and at a maximum 2 (one for key derivation and one for password hashing). -- Darren J Moffat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists