phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] winner selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <552E72FA.1090403@Oracle.COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:17:30 +0100
From: Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat@...cle.COM>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
CC: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PHC] winner selection



On 04/14/15 18:08, Marsh Ray wrote:
> From: Darren J Moffat
>>
>> Though personally I don't mind too much if we end up with different algorithms for the PDKDF2
>> (key derivation) replacement use cases versus "password hash" use cases.
>
> But isn't that where we want good interoperability even more than for credential storage? Think encrypted document interchange.

Yes I agree, and maybe I was too vague.  What I was saying was ideally 1 
winner and at a maximum 2 (one for key derivation and one for password 
hashing).

-- 
Darren J Moffat