lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:02:07 +0200
From: Milan Broz <>
Subject: Re: Updated tests document

On 04/16/2015 08:53 AM, Milan Broz wrote:
> I guess there are some bugs, pls let me know if you spot something apparently wrong there,

And just noted, one mistake could be wrong minimal t_cost settings,
it can measure some "unsupported" variant.

Do we have table with minimal tcost/mcost parameters supported?
(Some reference papers mention them explicitly but not all.)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists