lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:02:53 +0200
From: Sascha Schmidt <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Re: Updated tests document

2015-04-16 9:02 GMT+02:00 Milan Broz <>:
> On 04/16/2015 08:53 AM, Milan Broz wrote:
> Do we have table with minimal tcost/mcost parameters supported?
> (Some reference papers mention them explicitly but not all.)
Steve Thomas started one here:

For Catena:
t_cost in [1,255]
m_cost in [1,63]

A t_cost of 1 doesn't provide any additional memory hardness, but
maybe suitable for some scenarios.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists