phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Client-side hashing (was side-channel stuff)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALiR+uOLp+OMyGcf53LFUSV1z-V0w3ZDsE9hJTdfAnNPey_tsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:57:01 +0200
From: Sascha Schmidt <sascha.schmidt@...-weimar.de>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Client-side hashing (was side-channel stuff)

2015-04-25 0:40 GMT+02:00 Steve Thomas <steve@...tu.com>:
> h = fastHash(password, salt)
> for u = 1 to upgrade
> {
>   h = fastHash(slowHash(h, t_cost, m_cost))
>   t_cost = increaseTCost(t_cost)
>   m_cost = increaseMCost(m_cost)
> }
> return encrypt(h, key) // HSM? :)
You are totally right. I don't know how I missed this. The most
embarrassing thing is, that this would already be possible with
Catena. The only thing missing is the server-side finalization with
encryption.
I hope I haven't caused any confusion with my previous mail.