lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:08:22 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [PHC] Maximising Pseudo-Entropy versus resistance to Side-Channel

On Mon, 4 May 2015, Solar Designer wrote:

> Now our options are: use solely hashes and comparison functions that are
> side-channel safe(*) even without cryptographically random salts, or/and
> require cryptographically random salts.  The latter hardens existing
> software too - such as uses of strcmp() on password hashes in lots of
> existing software.

Not at all. Don't require cryptographically random salts, but try to 
generate them nevertheless. ;-)

THAT harends existing software too.

This is the counterpart to requiring cryptographically random salts 
without actually generating them -- which would weaken your sovtware.

So long


------  I  love  the  taste  of  Cryptanalysis  in  the morning!  ------
--Stefan.Lucks (at), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany--

Powered by blists - more mailing lists