lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:59:23 +0200 (CEST)
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Why protect against side channel attacks

On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Peter Maxwell wrote:

> You get the idea though: the salt must be secret to avoid an attacker being
> able to exploit the low dimension of the password space.  Are we assuming
> the salt as secret?

If we would assume the salt to be secret, we should not call it a "salt". 
To avoid confusion, it would then deserve to be called a "key".


--------  I  love  the  taste  of  Cryptanalysis  in  the morning!  --------
----Stefan.Lucks (at), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists