lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+hr98EXonhyp-WvB26XDomq6Y8RdhboWKyNTTNzjXfP3sw-Fw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:59:11 +0200 From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com> To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net> Subject: Re: [PHC] Why protect against side channel attacks On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Ben Harris <mail@...rr.is> wrote: > But no, the salt is better considered as "sensitive" and treated in the same > respect as the password hash. secret salt disables server relief
Powered by blists - more mailing lists