phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Why protect against side channel attacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+hr98EXonhyp-WvB26XDomq6Y8RdhboWKyNTTNzjXfP3sw-Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:59:11 +0200
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Why protect against side channel attacks

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Ben Harris <mail@...rr.is> wrote:
> But no, the salt is better considered as "sensitive" and treated in the same
> respect as the password hash.

secret salt disables server relief