phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Argon2 v1.0 versus v1.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGiyFdfe+ZvUVTeJMsYj4KsoWsWmz2QWdvvepKNub8AZiXfN4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:08:56 +0000
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Argon2 v1.0 versus v1.2

The 1.2 version of the document was shared on this list but the Argon
submission package was not updated, that's why the version on
https://password-hashing.net/candidates.html hasn't been updated.

I know updated the Argon (and Argon2) submission from v2 to v3, linking to
the Argon2 1.2 document. This is a bit messy and we should eventually have
a single version numbering.

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:26 PM Corrigan-Gibbs, Henry <henrycg@...nford.edu>
wrote:

>
> > On Jul 21, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Dmitry Khovratovich <
> khovratovich@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thus neither v1.0 nor v1.2 is the final version, but v1.2 is closer to
> it and whatever security analysis you are going to make probably should
> target v1.2 first.
>
> Great—that’s good to know. Thanks Dmitry, Bill, and Samuel for the quick
> responses.
>
> Henry
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped